EU: Journalists and creative workers call for a human-centric approach to regulating AI

The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has joined authors, performers and other creative workers and artists, representing several hundred thousand workers, in urging the European Union institutions to agree on a balanced regulation that not only forwards the advancement of AI technologies but also promotes original human creativity. As the negotiation of the AI Act enters its final “trilogue” stage, the undersigned organisations reiterate their position and insist on the absolute need for a human-centric approach to regulating generative AI that respects fundamental rights.

Olivier Morin / AFP

We represent several hundred thousand professional authors, performers, and other creative workers  and artists, who rely entirely on their ability to license and control the use of their work, as well as their  voice, likeness, and other personal data, to make a living. We all share a common concern as generative  AI rapidly spreads in a legal environment which is poorly enforced and lacks adequate safeguards  regarding the use of our members' works and personal data for AI training purposes. Equally  problematic are the numerous unauthorised, abusive, and deceptively transformative uses of our  members' protected works and personal data by AI-powered technologies.  

Our eyes are on the EU AI Act, which represents the first attempt by a major regulator to establish a  legal framework for the advancement of this technology, while safeguarding fundamental societal and  individual rights. As the negotiation of this Proposal enters its final “trilogue” stage, we must reiterate  our position and insist on the absolute need for a human-centric approach to regulating generative AI.  This approach should recognise, secure and enforce the right of our members to control the use of their  artistic creations during the machine-learning process. To make sure it protects human artistry and  creativity, it must be built upon principles of informed consent, transparency, fair remuneration and  contractual practices.  

We acknowledge that AI represents an extraordinary technological advancement with immense  potential to enhance various aspects of our lives, including in our sectors. However, it is crucial to  recognise that alongside these benefits, there exists a darker aspect to this technology. Generative AI is  trained on large sets of data and huge amounts of protected contents scraped and copied from the  internet. It is programmed to deliver outputs that closely mimic and have the ability to compete with  human creation. This technology poses several risks to our creative communities:  

Firstly, the protected works, voices, and images of our members are often used without their  knowledge, consent and remuneration to generate content. Some of these uses may harm their moral  and personality rights and prejudice their personal and professional reputation. Additionally, there is a  risk that their own work may become displaced, forcing them to compete against their digital replicas,  with dire economic consequences. There is also a broader societal risk, as people may be led to believe  that the content they encounter—whether in text, audio, or visuals—is a genuine and truthful human  creation, when it is the mere result of AI generation or manipulation. This deception can have far reaching implications for the spread of misinformation and the erosion of trust in the authenticity of  digital content. 

AI cannot be permitted to develop in a manner that disregards fundamental rights, such as authors and  performers rights, image, and personality rights, and it should not be employed in ways that may  deceive the general public. As the AI Act approaches its final stage of negotiations, the creative  professionals we represent request absolute transparency to be prioritised. This is essential to ensure  that informed consent and fair remuneration can be agreed upon, effectively implemented and  enforced in relation to both the input (protected contents and data used by machine-learning) and the  output (results generated).  

Authors, performers and other creative workers should be informed and have accessible means to give  or withhold authorisation when their protected contents or personal data are used, or are planned to  be used, to train AI. This is essential for them to be able to engage on fair terms with those using and  benefiting from their creative contents and their value, determining aspects such as the scope, purpose  and length of usage and how they may be remunerated for such use. At present, neither the CDSM  directive (and in particular Article 4 and its so-called “opt-out” mechanism) nor the GDPR are adequately  enforced in this radically new technological environment. It is crucial to acknowledge that none of the  protections built into these legal instruments has a slightest chance to work if strict transparency  requirements are not placed upon developers of generative AI. We welcome the European Parliament  proposals to include specific transparency requirements for AI foundational models, but it is paramount  to further enhance these safeguards by encompassing the reproduction of any protected works and  any personal data for purposes of training these models. Scraping and mining to train AI were initially  permitted for research and trend analysis purposes; today, this has become an integral part of  generating content: legislation must reflect this change in the use of protected works and personal data.  

The AI Act should also impose strict visible and/or audible labelling obligations to all deployers of  generative-AI powered technologies, warning the general public about the fact that what they are  watching, listening to or reading has been altered or generated by AI. While these obligations may be  adapted to the nature of the content in order not to hinder its exploitation, we firmly reject broad  exceptions that would render labelling obligations practically meaningless, such as when it is deemed  “necessary for the exercise of the right to freedom of expression and the right to freedom of the arts  and sciences guaranteed in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU”, or “where the content is part  of an evidently creative, satirical, artistic or fictional work”.  

We urge the European institutions to agree on a balanced regulation that not only forwards the  advancement of AI technologies but also promotes original human creativity in our societies and  preserves the rights and livelihoods of the authors and artists we represent.    

 

  • CEATL (European Council of Literary Translators’ Associations) was created in 1993 as a platform  where literary translators’ associations from different European countries could exchange views and  information, and join forces to improve status and working conditions of translators. It now unites 34  member associations from 26 countries across Europe, representing some 10,000 individual literary  translators. Web: www.ceatl.eu / EU Transparency Register ID: 65913704675-82 
  • ECSA (European Composer and Songwriter Alliance) represents over 30,000 professional composers  and songwriters in 27 European countries. With 54 member organisations across Europe, the  Alliance speaks for the interests of music creators of art & classical music (contemporary), film &  audiovisual music, as well as popular music.  Web: www.composeralliance.org / EU Transparency Register ID: 71423433087-91 
  • EFJ (European Federation of Journalists) is the largest organisation of journalists in Europe,  representing over 320,000 journalists in 73 journalists’ organisations across 45 countries. The EFJ is  recognised by the European Union and the Council of Europe as the representative voice of  journalists in Europe. The EFJ is a member of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC). Web: www.europeanjournalists.com / EU Transparency Register ID: 27471236588-39 
  • EGAIR (European Guild for Artificial Intelligence Regulation) is a network of creatives and  associations from all over Europe, lobbying for the protection of artists' works and data from AI  companies. Originally founded by MeFu, the Italian association of comic book creators, EGAIR now  represents over 20.000 creatives, artists and associations. Web: www.egair.eu / EU Transparency Register ID: 385629348610-21 
  • EWC (European Writers’ Council) is the world’s largest federation representing solely authors from  the book sector and constituted by 49 national professional writers’ and literary translators’  associations from 31 countries. EWC members comprise over 220.000 professional authors, writing  and publishing in 33 languages.  Web: europeanwriterscouncil.eu/ EU Transparency Register ID: 56788289570-24  
  • FERA (Federation of European Screen Directors) represents film and TV directors at European level,  with 48 directors’ associations as members from 35 countries. Founded in 1980, FERA speaks for  more than 20,000 European screen directors, representing their cultural, creative and economic  interests.  Web: screendirectors.eu/ EU Transparency Register ID: 29280842236- 21  
  • FIA (International Federation of Actors) is a global union federation representing performers‘ trade  unions, guilds and professional associations in about 70 countries. In a connected world of content  and entertainment, it stands for fair social, economic and moral rights for audio-visual performers  working in all recorded media and live theatre.  Web: www.fia-actors.com / EU Transparency Register ID: 24070646198-51 
  • FIM (International Federation of Musicians) is the only body representing professional musicians and  their trade unions globally, with members in about 65 countries covering all regions of the world.  Founded in 1948, FIM is recognised as an NGO by diverse international authorities such as the ILO,  WIPO, UNESCO, the European Commission, the European Parliament or the Council of Europe.  Web: www.fim-musicians.org/ EU Transparency Register ID: 01953872943-65  
  • FSE (Federation of Screenwriters in Europe) is a network of national and regional associations, guilds  and unions of writers for the screen in Europe, created in June 2001. It comprises 25 organisations  from 19 countries, representing more than 7,000 screenwriters in Europe.  Web: www.federationscreenwriters.eu / EU Transparency Register ID: 642670217507-74 
  • IAO (International Artist Organisation) is the umbrella association for national organisations  advocating for the rights and interests of the Featured Artists in the music industry. Our main  interests are transparency, the protection of intellectual property rights and a fair reflection of the  value an artist’s work generatesWeb: www.iaomusic.org / EU Transparency Register ID: 490166825799-90 
  • IFJ (International Federation of Journalists) is the world's largest organisation of journalists,  representing 600,000 media professionals from 187 trade unions and associations in more than 140  countries. Web: www.ifj.org / EU Transparency Register ID: 999725935832-94 
  • UNI MEI - UNI - Media, Entertainment and Arts unites over 140 unions and guilds to raise standards  and enforce rights for more than 500.000 creatives, technicians and auxiliary workers. Together, our  members work for a fair, inclusive, equal, and sustainable global entertainment industry and a just  transformation. Web: www.uniglobalunion.org / EU Transparency Register ID: 605859248462-93 
  • UVA (United Voice Artists) is a global coalition of voice acting guilds, associations, and unions that  have united to pursue their shared goals of protecting and preserving the act of creating, in  particular, through the human voice. This collaborative effort brings together prominent associations  and unions from the European Union, including France, Spain, Italy, Germany, Austria, Belgium, and  Poland, as well as organizations in Switzerland, Turkey, the United States of America, Africa and in  South America. Web: www.unitedvoiceartists.com / EU Transparency register ID: 810100650765-18

For more information, please contact IFJ on +32 2 235 22 16

The IFJ represents more than 600,000 journalists in 146 countries

Follow the IFJ on TwitterFacebook and Instagram

Subscribe to IFJ News