31 août 2009

IFJ Condemns Brutal Jail Term for Sri Lankan Journalist Tissainayagam

The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today condemned a 20-year jail term against senior Sri Lankan journalist J.S. Tissainayagam as "brutal and inhumane" and accused Sri Lankan authorities of abusing anti-terror laws to silence peaceful critics.

The High Court of Colombo today convicted Tissainayagam, a prominent Tamil journalist, of "causing communal disharmony" and "receiving money from Tamil Tiger rebels to pay for his website".

He was detained last year and later charged with inciting violence in articles in his magazine, the North Eastern Monthly, which has since closed. The landmark ruling makes Tissainayagam one of a handful of journalists in the world to be convicted of terrorism for the content of their journalism.

"This man has been victimised for no more than holding the Government to account and giving voice to legitimate if critical opinion," IFJ General Secretary Aidan White said. "The sentence is disproportionate, brutal and inhumane and is a chilling reminder of how dangerous Sri Lanka has become for independent journalists."

The IFJ is one of the international press freedom and rights groups that have been campaigning for Tissainayagam's release and for Sri Lanka to tone down anti-terrorism legislation which is being used against government critics.

On March 7, 2008, Tissainayagam was detained without charge by the Terrorist Investigation Division (TID) of the Sri Lankan police. At the time he was the editor of an online newspaper, OutReach.sl.com. He was held for more than five months until being charged with publishing and distributing a magazine containing material alleged to have brought the government into disrepute.

Earlier this year, United States President Barack Obama named Tissainayagam as an "emblematic example" of the "distressing reality" of courageous journalists who face intimidation, censorship and arbitrary arrest for their professional work. 

"The IFJ is anxious over the welfare of Tissainayagam in prison," White said. "Sri Lankan authorities must ensure he is housed in a safe environment and has access to medical assistance for his deteriorating health."

The Colombo High Court found Tissainayagam guilty of inciting ethnic and racial disharmony, of printing and publishing such material, and of collecting money for the North Eastern Monthly from NGOs.

However, defence lawyers said there was no evidence of attempts by him to stir up religious, racial or regional conflict. He was being accused only because he is a Tamil, they said, and because of his criticism of government and state security forces. The charges against Tissainayagam and two colleagues, Jesiharan and Valarmathi, were laid under the PTA, a draconian and "temporary law" that has remained on Sri Lanka's statute books since it was introduced in 1979.

Since Tissainayagam's arrest, the IFJ has been concerned about his treatment in detention, including how he was tortured to make a confession. He was held without explanation for more than 150 days, during which time he was reportedly tortured and denied medical treatment. Court hearings were postponed arbitrarily and a human rights case lodged by his lawyers was not properly investigated.

The IFJ says the prosecution and conviction is symbolic of crumbling press freedom in Sri Lanka, where at least eight journalists have been killed since 2007. Others have been beaten, harassed, detained and threatened with death.  Many journalists have been forced to leave the country for their safety.

"We will not give up our campaign for Tissainayagam," said White. "He should be released and this terrible injustice undone immediately."

For media comment, contact:

Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary: +32 2 235 2210/+32 478 258 669 (Brussels)

IFJ Asia-Pacific office: +612 9333 0919 (Sydney)

The IFJ represents over 600,000 journalists in 123 countries worldwide

Sri Lanka, Asia and Pacific, Press Release, jurisprudence

Commentaires :

Don Kiri

31 août 2009 à 23H05

All the western contries has by law any one can not create national unrest using racial hatred, so the same law applied in SriLanka. What a big deal why freedom of speach used for this kind of matter, no one can use freedom of speach and write to kill inocent people this is all bias thinking. SriLanka is a souvering country, They have their laws, that country use that laws against unlawefull people. Don't cry for this matter to help terroriest

DJ

01 septembre 2009 à 06H03

Oh IFJ.. earlier you people wanted to charge him without holding him for so long.. now you people condemn the verdict. Rather, you could have told not to charge him, just release him, without minding any of terror links he has!! Law in a country should be equal to anyone.. being a journalist doesn't mean that you have the licence to do dirty tricks with terrorist elements hiding under journalism against well being of general public. Journalist is not a 'messaiah' who descended down from heaven. Every journalist and their insitutions should understand this. He is a human being who is greedy for money, property, popularity, sex or what ever. And Mr. Barac Obama's statements are errelevent to another country other than oxygen to some so called 'concerns'. People in that country are best to judge their own people. If our president says Bin Laden's media men are examples to other journalists, do you accept and repeat it to Obama?? Or else US President and US people are the best to judge them?? Further.. you people can not challenge a verdict of a court in a country in mere statements without a knowing facts.. rather be honest and realistic.. fund him to get good judges and facts if say so.. and help him. You Western media people are another bunch of high headed people who create a lot of problems in the present day world!!

P.Riyad

01 septembre 2009 à 09H31

Your intense concern for a man who tried to espouse and further the rabid efforts of a terrorist group is tragic. We faced daily threats of being blown apart by bombs and explosive devices of kinds. People like you who want 'news' at any cost, even of our lives, have conveniently forgotten that era. Tissanayagam is in jail because he was a supporter of a murderous outfit, and not a 'peaceful critic', as you call him. The likes of him abused the freedom of the press to encourage those fighting the legitimately elected government of this country. And now is the time for him to pay the price for putting all of us at risk. In the western democracies, even if you are overheard mentioning anything in support terrorism, you will be locked away with no questions asked. After 9/11 the Americans went to Pakistan and secretly whisked away people on suspicion of terrorist activity, and you were silent. So, what are shouting about now, anyway?

sferando

01 septembre 2009 à 12H59

this sentence was just and deserved . it came after a court case where both sides presented their case and he was represented by lawyers ( paid for by ngos ) , his case for innocence failed because evidence proved that he was inciting violence and hatred and he was supporting terrorism by collecting money and information . as such it was just. it was deserved because what he supported was tamil tiger terrorism, that killed thousands of innocent people here in sri lanka . he supported a brutal cause and helped killers. you call a this sentence for such a person "brutal " . where were you when he and his animal friends were killing us? where were you when he and his beastly friends were depriving millions in sri lanka of their freedom of expression ( and almost all our other rights)? this statement by ifj is an example of most vicious kinds of hypocrisy, willful blindness, and distortion of facts!

Si vous ne voyez pas un commentaire que vous avez ajouté c'est qu'il est en cours de modération ou a été rejeté.

Ajouter un commentaire :

Sur {SITE_NAME} vous pouvez exprimer votre opinion sur les contenus.

Cette section est modérée. Les textes ne sont publiés qu'après modération. {SITE_NAME} se réserve le droit de rejeter tout commentaire ne respectant pas la ligne éditoriale.