26 August 2009

Journalists' Groups Protest over US Media Vetting in Afghanistan

The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and United States journalists' groups today condemned military vetting of journalists covering the Afghanistan conflict to see if they are sympathetic to the American cause.

Journalists and media people seeking to travel under the protection of US armed forces to report on the escalating military operations in Afghanistan may be screened by a Washington public relations firm commissioned by the Pentagon to determine whether media coverage portrays the US military in a positive light.

"This profiling of journalists further compromises the independence of media," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "It strips away any pretence that the army is interested in helping journalists to work freely. It suggests they are more interested in propaganda than honest reporting."

According to the American journal Stars and Stripes, journalists may be vetted by The Rendon Group, a notorious public relations firm which prior to the US invasion of Iraq helped create the Iraqi National Congress, an opposition group later blamed for spreading false information about Iraq's supposed possession of weapons of mass destruction.

Two months ago, American army officials barred a Stars and Stripes reporter from embedding with a unit in Iraq because the reporter "refused to highlight" good news promoted by military commanders.

The IFJ affiliate organisations in the US have added their voices to the protest. Roberta Reardon, President of the American Federation of Radio and Television Artists, whose members include broadcast journalists said: "Many Americans rely on the unbiased information that journalists report to understand what is happening in the world and to make critical decisions. If the military pre-approves only certain journalists to report a specific point-of-view or agenda, our decisions cannot be made independently or freely and that threatens our democracy. I am deeply disturbed by this assault on quality broadcast journalism and on our freedom."

Bernie Lunzer, President of TNG-CWA, and representing newspaper reporters joined the protest adding: "This practice would undermine our core value, the ability to report the truth objectively and without government censorship. Embedding has its own problems, but this is over the line."  

The IFJ says that the recent merger of US and NATO public relations work in Kabul has created a single source for media information and handling all requests from journalists to be embedded. This has reinforced the influence of The Rendon Group. According to official sources there are at present 60 media outlets - excluding Afghan media - on the ground with US and NATO forces.

"Bringing democracy to Afghanistan is a massive challenge," said White. "But it will not be made easier by trying to manipulate media or encouraging journalists to show bias in favour of the military."

For more information contact the IFJ at +32 2 235 2207

The IFJ represents over 600,000 journalists in 123 countries worldwide

Afghanistan, United States Of America, Asia § Pacific, North America, Press Release

Comments :

duhham

26 August 2009 at 22:29

If Journalist want to cover stories in combat situations...they probably need to bring a weapon to protect their own backsides. Don't expect any government military to protect them if they are not going to look favorably to those who are watching their backsides! Personally....today's media (especially in America) is being bought and paid for to the highest bidder. Very, very few media outlets are not biased--unfortunately.

Witch

26 August 2009 at 22:56

So the U.S. military is concerned whether or not the folks whose tails they're covering are going to give aid and comfort to the enemy and this concerned sparks outrage amongst so-called journalists? If these journalists are so concerned over such hyperbolic threats to democracy, I'm sure they can go forth without the help of the very organization they're criticizing. The American and International media is not really well-known over the past decade or two for providing "unbiased" journalism. They're not really welll known for providing factual information over the past few years. In some cases, there has been outright manipulation of the information. Therefore, the vetting process of the U.S. military is borne out of self interest. Let's stop the pretense that journalists are above criticism and fault. These are major combat operations here, not domestic reporting. If you want to bite the hand that protects you, then you should probably get your own security if you're so concerned with the "protection" of democracy. Which, consequently is something in which the U.S. military EXACTLY is actively involved. This story lacks perspective.

Humlicek

26 August 2009 at 23:07

If "journalists" don't like being screened in Afghanistan, why don't they provide for their own security and bypass the military? This is a war, and it never helps being undermined by obtuse armchair quarterbacks. If the liberal media's great ideas and insights really worked, those "journalists" would have been over there fixing the problem before it ever escalated into a war.

If you don't see one of your comments, that means that it is not moderated yet or it has been rejected.

Add a comment :

On {SITE_NAME}, you can share your opinion on all of our news.

This section is moderated. The texts will be published after editor approval. {SITE_NAME} reserves the right to reject any comment at any time.