26 August 2009
Journalists' Groups Protest over US Media Vetting in Afghanistan
The
International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and United
States journalists' groups today condemned military vetting
of journalists covering the Afghanistan
conflict to see if they are sympathetic to the American cause.
Journalists
and media people seeking to travel under the protection of US armed forces to
report on the escalating military operations in Afghanistan
may be screened by a Washington public
relations firm commissioned by the Pentagon to determine whether media coverage
portrays the US
military in a positive light.
"This profiling of journalists further compromises the independence of media,"
said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "It strips away any pretence that the
army is interested in helping journalists to work freely. It suggests they are
more interested in propaganda than honest reporting."
According
to the American journal Stars and Stripes, journalists may be vetted by The
Rendon Group, a notorious public relations firm which prior to the US invasion of Iraq
helped create the Iraqi National Congress, an opposition group later blamed for
spreading false information about Iraq's supposed possession of
weapons of mass destruction.
Two months
ago, American army officials barred a Stars and Stripes reporter from
embedding with a unit in Iraq
because the reporter "refused to highlight" good news promoted by
military commanders.
The IFJ affiliate
organisations in the US
have added their voices to the protest. Roberta
Reardon, President of the American Federation of Radio and Television Artists,
whose members include broadcast journalists said: "Many Americans rely on the unbiased information that
journalists report to understand what is happening in the world and to make
critical decisions. If the military pre-approves only certain journalists to
report a specific point-of-view or agenda, our decisions cannot be made
independently or freely and that threatens our democracy. I am deeply disturbed
by this assault on quality broadcast journalism and on our freedom."
Bernie
Lunzer, President of TNG-CWA, and representing newspaper reporters joined the
protest adding: "This practice would undermine our core value, the ability to report the
truth objectively and without government censorship. Embedding has its own
problems, but this is over the line."
The IFJ says that the recent merger of US and NATO public relations work in Kabul has created a single
source for media information and handling all requests from journalists to be
embedded. This has reinforced the influence of The Rendon Group. According to
official sources there are at present 60 media outlets - excluding Afghan media
- on the ground with US and NATO forces.
"Bringing
democracy to Afghanistan
is a massive challenge," said White. "But it will not be made easier by trying
to manipulate media or encouraging journalists to show bias in favour of the
military."
For more
information contact the IFJ at +32 2 235 2207
The IFJ represents over 600,000 journalists
in 123 countries worldwide










Comments :
duhham
26 August 2009 at 22:29
If Journalist want to cover stories in combat situations...they probably need to bring a weapon to protect their own backsides. Don't expect any government military to protect them if they are not going to look favorably to those who are watching their backsides! Personally....today's media (especially in America) is being bought and paid for to the highest bidder. Very, very few media outlets are not biased--unfortunately.
Witch
26 August 2009 at 22:56
So the U.S. military is concerned whether or not the folks whose tails they're covering are going to give aid and comfort to the enemy and this concerned sparks outrage amongst so-called journalists? If these journalists are so concerned over such hyperbolic threats to democracy, I'm sure they can go forth without the help of the very organization they're criticizing. The American and International media is not really well-known over the past decade or two for providing "unbiased" journalism. They're not really welll known for providing factual information over the past few years. In some cases, there has been outright manipulation of the information. Therefore, the vetting process of the U.S. military is borne out of self interest. Let's stop the pretense that journalists are above criticism and fault. These are major combat operations here, not domestic reporting. If you want to bite the hand that protects you, then you should probably get your own security if you're so concerned with the "protection" of democracy. Which, consequently is something in which the U.S. military EXACTLY is actively involved. This story lacks perspective.
Humlicek
26 August 2009 at 23:07
If "journalists" don't like being screened in Afghanistan, why don't they provide for their own security and bypass the military? This is a war, and it never helps being undermined by obtuse armchair quarterbacks. If the liberal media's great ideas and insights really worked, those "journalists" would have been over there fixing the problem before it ever escalated into a war.
If you don't see one of your comments, that means that it is not moderated yet or it has been rejected.
Add a comment :
On {SITE_NAME}, you can share your opinion on all of our news.
This section is moderated. The texts will be published after editor approval. {SITE_NAME} reserves the right to reject any comment at any time.