09 September 2009
IFJ Calls for Safety Review after Media Tragedy in Afghanistan
The
International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) today welcomed the rescue of a
British journalist in Afghanistan
but called for a safety review after his Afghan interpreter was killed in the
military operation.
According
to reports from Afghanistan,
Nato troops raided the place where Taliban militants were holding Stephen
Farrell and Sultan Munadi in the Char Dara district at dawn on 9 September.
Farrell was rescued but Sultan, 34, died in the fire fight between Nato
soldiers and the militants. One Nato soldier and two civilians were also
killed.
"The
good news of Stephen's successful rescue has been overshadowed by Sultan's
tragic killing," said Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary. "It reminds us of the
sacrifice that we all have to pay for media freedom."
Stephen,
the New York Times reporter, was kidnapped with Sultan last week as he was
investigating the Nato air attack on two fuel tankers which had been hijacked
by Taliban militants. Media reports say the air strike killed many people,
including civilians.
The
IFJ says that journalists in Afghanistan
should not be prevented from reporting independently, provided that they are
confident about their personal safety and that of their local colleagues.
"The
killing of Sultan brings into sharp focus the issue of safety of local
personnel who are employed by foreign media organisations in Afghanistan,"
added White. "We must ensure that, like all reporters, they are properly
trained to work in dangerous conditions."
The
IFJ further calls on Nato leadership in Afghanistan to investigate the
circumstances which led to Sultan's killing and engage with Afghan Association
of Journalists on their safety needs.
"There
is no faulting the intentions behind the rescue operation," said White. "But if
lessons can be learned for the future, an investigation and review of what
happened here will be helpful."
For more information
contact the IFJ at +32 2 235 2207
The IFJ represents over 600,000 journalists
in 123 countries worldwide










Comments :
Thornton
10 September 2009 at 01:17
'The good news of Stephen's successful rescue has been overshadowed by Sultan's tragic killing.' 'One Nato soldier and two civilians were also killed.' The first quote above makes no mention of the fact that a British paratrooper, with a family at home as eager for his safe return as that of Sultan and Stephen, lay down his life in order to rescue a journalist who had been kidnapped for no reason other than advancing his own career in the knowledge that should harm come his way, then troops would be told to risk their lives in order to ensure his safe return. How is this right? Why should brave and courageous professionial soldiers be withdrawn from their mission, the true mission, that is defeating the Taleban, for the sake of rescuing journalists who know the dangers they are walking into and speak nothing of the heroism of their rescuers once they are free?
If you don't see one of your comments, that means that it is not moderated yet or it has been rejected.
Add a comment :
On {SITE_NAME}, you can share your opinion on all of our news.
This section is moderated. The texts will be published after editor approval. {SITE_NAME} reserves the right to reject any comment at any time.